Ray Watson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. University Medical Center; Mike Parker; Bill Andrws,defendants-appellees, 133 F.3d 931 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: SNEED, LEAVY, and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Ray Watson appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in his action alleging race discrimination in employment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. After a de novo review of the record, see Forsyth v. Humana, Inc., 114 F.3d 1467, 1474 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 1997 WL 592548 (U.S. Dec. 1, 1997) (No. 97-504), we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order entered on September 6, 1996.
Because Watson is not a prisoner proceeding pro se, his contention regarding notification of the requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 lacks merit. See Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.