William Carlyle, Jr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Angus Saint-evens; Dorothy Mcgee; Kenneth Hopkins,defendants-appellees, 133 F.3d 926 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore SNEED, LEAVY, and TROTT, JJ.
MEMORANDUM*
LEVI
William J. Carlyle appeals pro se the district court's grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action against Angus Saint-Evens and other defendants involved in Carlyle's state court action regarding the purchase of real property. We have reviewed the record and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its Memorandum of Opinion and Order, filed on February 11, 1997.
AFFIRMED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4. Accordingly, Carlyle's request for oral argument is denied
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
