Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.evelyn E. Rice; Robert Hohlt, Appellants, Lesley Borovicka,cheryl Holland; Katie Broyles; Ann Deaton; Health Care,inc.; Shirley Harrison; Mark Anderson; Diane Webb;kathie Godsey; Gregory A. Vadner, Director, Division Ofaging, Appellees, 133 F.3d 923 (8th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 133 F.3d 923 (8th Cir. 1997) Dec. 18, 1997

Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Plaintiffs appeal from a final order entered by the District Court1  dismissing their complaint. For reversal, plaintiffs argue principally that the court misapplied the Rooker-Feldman doctrine and the Colorado River abstention doctrine. Having reviewed the case, we conclude the District Court committed no error of law, nor did it abuse its discretion. For the reasons stated in the District Court's memorandum and order, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

 1

The Honorable E. Richard Webber, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.