Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.carmen C. Reul, Appellant, v. Manpower International, Inc., Appellee, 131 F.3d 144 (8th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 131 F.3d 144 (8th Cir. 1997) Submitted: November 17, 1997. Filed: November 26, 1997

Appeal from the United v. States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

Before BOWMAN, LAY, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Carmen C. Reul appeals from a summary judgment entered by the District Court1  in favor of Manpower International, Inc., a temporary employment agency and the defendant in Reul's action under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Minnesota Human Rights Act. Having reviewed the case, we are satisfied the District Court properly concluded that Reul failed to come forward with sufficient evidence to create a question of fact as to whether Manpower's legitimate, non-discriminatory reasons for not placing her in any positions were a pretext for unlawful discrimination. Summary judgment thus was correctly entered.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

 1

The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.