United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Paul Eugene Jamar, Defendant-appellant, 122 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 1997)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 122 F.3d 1075 (9th Cir. 1997) Submitted Aug. 25, 1997. **Decided Aug. 28, 1997

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California William Matthew Byrne, Jr., Chief Judge, Presiding

Before: SCHROEDER, FERNANDEZ and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM* 

Paul Eugene Jamar's contention that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for selective prosecution is rejected in light of our recent opinion in United States v. Turner, 104 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct. 1566 (1997). Accordingly, his conviction and sentence are

AFFIRMED.

 **

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

 *

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.