United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Haywood Williams, Jr., Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Haywood Williams, Jr., Defendant-appellant, 12 F.3d 206 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Haywood Williams, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Raymond Alvin Jackson, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, for Appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying his motions for production of sealed records (No. 93-6842), and for supplementation of the record on appeal (No. 93-6905).* Our review of the record and the district court's opinions discloses that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Williams, No. CR-80-14-N (E.D. Va. July 26, 1993; Aug. 13, 1993). We deny Williams' motions for appointment of counsel and oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We consolidated these cases on appeal
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
