United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Andrew Windsor, Defendant-appellant, 12 F.3d 206 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Andrew Windsor, Appellant Pro Se.
Bradley Stuart Lui, Senior Assistant United States Attorney, for Appellee.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Windsor, Nos. CR-90-228-A; CA-91-937-AM (E.D. Va. July 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED
Since the Court has received all necessary papers in this case, Windsor's motion for an extension of time to respond to the docketing statement is moot
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
