United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Antonio Valenzuela-jasso, Defendant-appellant, 119 F.3d 8 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: HUG, Chief Judge, KOZINSKI and LEAVY, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM*
Federal prisoner Antonio Valenzuela-Jasso appeals pro se the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction for using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (1). Valenzuela contends his conviction should be vacated because he did not personally "use" a firearm as defined in Bailey v. United States, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995), and because the jury was given erroneous instructions regarding use of a firearm. We affirm.
The district court did not err by denying Valenzuela's motion because the undisputed evidence in the record indicates Valenzuela carried the firearm on his person during a drug transaction. See United States v. Lopez, 100 F.3d 98, 101 (9th Cir. 1996). Moreover, any instructional error was harmless. California v. Roy, 117 S. Ct. 337, 339 (1997).
AFFIRMED.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.