In Re Painewebber Incorporated Limited Partnerships Litigationrochelle Rittmaster, on Behalf of Herself and All Otherssimilarly Situated, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Robert Jacobson, Vera Jacobson, Appellants,painewebber Group, Inc.; Painewebber, Inc., Defendants-appellees, 117 F.3d 721 (2d Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - 117 F.3d 721 (2d Cir. 1997) Argued July 15, 1997. Decided July 30, 1997

Edward T. Joyce, Chicago, IL, for Appellants.

Edward Labaton, New York City (Nicholas E. Chimicles, Fred Taylor Isquith, Edward Grossmann, Burton H. Finkelstein, David J. Bershad, of counsel), for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Matthew Gluck, New York City (Peter L. Simmons, Rachel S. Fleishman, of counsel), for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: WINTER, Chief Judge, JACOBS and LEVAL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robert and Vera Jacobson appeal from Judge Stein's approval of a settlement and allocation agreement in this class action and denial of the Jacobsons' motions to intervene and to be certified as subclass representatives. We affirm for the reasons set forth in Judge Stein's opinions. In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnerships Litig., 171 F.R.D. 104 (S.D.N.Y. 1997); In re PaineWebber Ltd. Partnership Litig., --- F.R.D. ----, No. 94 Civ. 8547(SHS) (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 26, 1996).

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.