Andranik Tsovikian, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent, 116 F.3d 486 (9th Cir. 1997)
Annotate this CaseBefore: BRUNETTI and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges; HOGAN,*** District Judge.
MEMORANDUM*
Andranik Tsovikian petitions for review of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") affirming the denial of his application for asylum and withholding of deportation by the immigration judge ("IJ"). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), and we deny the petition.
The BIA determined that Tsovikian failed to demonstrate past persecution or a well-founded fear of future persecution "on account of ... political opinion." 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a) (42). Only if the evidence compels the conclusion that Tsovikian was persecuted or fears persecution because of political opinion do we reverse the BIA. INS v. Elias-Zacharias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 n. 1 (1992). As Tsovikian presented only scant and vague evidence to demonstrate that he was persecuted or fears persecution on account of political opinion, see id. at 483-84--certainly not evidence to compel that conclusion--we deny his petition.
PETITION DENIED.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)1 Ninth Circuit R. 34-4
* The Honorable Michael R. Hogan, Chief United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit R. 36-3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
