Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit, 110 F.3d 60 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseNo. 96-2352.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 27, 1997.Decided: April 2, 1997.
Robert B. Slaby, Louise A. Slaby, Appellants Pro Se. Lynn T. Krause, KRAUSE & FERRIS, P.A., Annapolis, Maryland; Kathryn Miller Goldman, WEINER, ASTRACHAN, GUNST, HILLMAN & ALLEN, P.A., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants appeal the district court's order entering judgment for Appellees on Appellants' claim alleging discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp.1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Slaby v. Berkshire, No. CA-94-1633-Y (D. Md. Aug. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
