United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Leroy R. Brandt, Defendant-appellant, 106 F.3d 409 (9th Cir. 1997)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 106 F.3d 409 (9th Cir. 1997) Argued and Submitted Dec. 13, 1996. Decided Jan. 15, 1997

Before: NOONAN, THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

We vacate the defendant Brandt's sentence and remand this case to the district court to enable that court to reconsider its imposition of a two-level increase in the defendant Leroy R. Brandt's base offense level under Sentencing Guideline § 2D1.1(b) (1) for possessing a dangerous weapon in connection with his offense. Reconsideration is appropriate in light of the district court's inability to find, during the subsequent sentencing hearing of Brandt's co-defendant John Dorman, that the firearm belonged to any of the conspirators. On reconsideration, the district court shall determine whether there is sufficient evidence to conclude that Brandt or a co-conspirator "possessed" the firearm on top of the motorcycle in the garage in connection with the conspiracy. If the evidence is insufficient to establish this fact, as apparently was the case when the co-defendant Dorman was sentenced, the two-level increase under Sentencing Guideline § 2D1.1(b) (1) would not be appropriate.

Sentence VACATED; case REMANDED.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.