John Doe, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 106 F.3d 400 (6th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 106 F.3d 400 (6th Cir. 1996) Dec. 23, 1996

Before: LIVELY, BOGGS, and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.


Plaintiff, under the pseudonym of John Doe, appeals from an order of the district court granting the government's motion for summary judgment in this action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Having had the benefit of oral argument, and having carefully considered the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties, we are not persuaded that the district court erred in granting summary judgment to the government.

As the reasons why judgment should be entered for the government have been articulated by the district court, the issuance of a full written opinion by this court would be duplicative and serve no useful purpose. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed upon the reasoning utilized by the district judge and stated in open court on May 9, 1995.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.