David Mizkun, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Glen Craig, Sheriff; Arturo Venegas, Jr., Chief; City Ofsacramento, Defendants-appellees, 103 F.3d 139 (9th Cir. 1996)

 Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 103 F.3d 139 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. *Decided Dec. 06, 1996

Before: SNEED, TROTT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM** 

David Mizcun appeals pro se the district court's dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that Sacramento County Sheriff Glen Craig and others had violated his constitutional rights by allowing officers to harass him. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its orders entered on June 3, 1996 and March 29, 1996.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.