Rosa Elvira Gil, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent, 103 F.3d 138 (9th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 103 F.3d 138 (9th Cir. 1996) Submitted Dec. 2, 1996. *Decided Dec. 06, 1996

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals, No. A70-784-589.

BIA

DISMISSED.

Before: SNEED, TROTT, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Rosa Elvira Gil, a native and citizen of Peru, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA"), dismissing her appeal of the immigration judge's ("IJ") denial of her motion to reopen deportation proceedings. The IJ issued an order of deportation in absentia when Gil failed to appear at the scheduled hearing. Because Gil's petition is untimely, we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the petition.

It is well established that the requirement of a timely petition for review is mandatory and jurisdictional. Haroutunian v. INS, 87 F.3d 374, 375 (9th Cir. 1996). A petition for review of a final deportation order entered in absentia must be filed not later than sixty days after the date of the final order of deportation. 8 U.S.C. § 1252b(c) (4).

On December 4, 1995, the BIA dismissed Gil's appeal of the IJ's decision to deny her motion to reopen deportation proceedings, and the deportation order became final. Gil filed her petition for review of the BIA's order on March 4, 1996, more than sixty days after the issuance of the BIA's order.

Because the petition for review was not filed within sixty days of the issuance of the BIA's order, we have no jurisdiction to consider it.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.