Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.emily Mangus, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security,defendant-appellee, 101 F.3d 695 (4th Cir. 1996)
Annotate this CaseEmily Mangus, Appellant Pro Se. Charlotte Jefferson Hardnett, David Marcellus Frazier, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Stephen Michael Horn, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
S.D.W. Va.
AFFIRMED
Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order affirming the Secretary's final decision denying her claim for disability benefits. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mangus v. Chater, Commissioner of Social Security, No. CA-94-171-2 (S.D.W. Va. Jan. 11, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
