Notice: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) States That Citation of Unpublished Dispositions is Disfavored Except for Establishing Res Judicata, Estoppel, or the Law of the Case and Requires Service of Copies of Cited Unpublished Dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.herschell L. Harris, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Sue King, Defendant-appellee, 101 F.3d 695 (4th Cir. 1996)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 101 F.3d 695 (4th Cir. 1996) Submitted Nov. 7, 1996. Decided Nov. 18, 1996

Herschell L. Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his employment discrimination action as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub. L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, Harris v. King, No. CA-96-238 (E.D. Va. Mar. 21, 1996), but modify the dismissal to be without prejudice. 28 U.S.C. § 2106 (1994). We deny Appellant's motions for production of documents, expedited consideration, and to amend the caption. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.