Notice: This Summary Order May Not Be Cited As Precedential Authority, but May Be Called to the Attention of the Court in a Subsequent Stage of This Case, in a Related Case, or in Any Case for Purposes of Collateral Estoppel or Res Judicata. See Second Circuit Rule 0.23, 101 F.3d 109 (2d Cir. 1995)
Annotate this CaseNo. 95-2621.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
March 26, 1996.
APPEARING FOR APPELLANT:Peter J. Perro, Collins, New York, pro se. APPEARING FOR APPELLEE:Robert H. Cabble, Assistant Suffolk County Attorney, Hauppauge, New York.
E.D.N.Y.
AFFIRMED.
Before Honorable J. DANIEL MAHONEY, JOSEPH M. McLAUGHLIN, and GUIDO CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.
This cause came on to be heard on the transcript of record from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York and was taken on submission.
ON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff-appellant Peter Perro appeals pro se from an order entered August 3, 1995 that dismissed his claims of malicious prosecution, false arrest, and unreasonable search pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Perro v. Guido, No. CV 92-2657, slip op. (E.D.N.Y. Aug. 2, 1995). We affirm substantially for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of the district court. See id. at 3-5.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
