United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Roy Lee Owens, Defendant-appellant.united States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Roy Lee Owens, Defendant-appellant, 10 F.3d 807 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Rockingham.
Roy Lee Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED IN NO. 92-6946 AND DISMISSED IN NO. 93-6974.
Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Roy Lee Owens appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, in No. 92-6946 we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. The appeal in No. 92-6946 brings up the district court's dismissal of the habeas action and the denial of reconsideration. Because the appeal in No. 92-6974 is duplicative, it is hereby dismissed.* United States v. Owens, Nos. CR-89-237-R; CA-91-396-3 (M.D.N.C. July 7, 1992). We deny Owens's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
No. 92-6946-AFFIRMED No. 92-6974-DISMISSED
Owens's motions for production of documents and appointment of counsel are denied
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
