Evone Foreman Gibson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; Chesapeake Andpotomac Telephone Company, Defendants-appellees, 1 F.3d 1233 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (CA-92-59)
Evone Foreman Gibson, Appellant Pro Se.
Samuel Alan Marcosson, United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, D. C.; Thomas Michael Lucas, Thomas Francis Hennessy, III, Vandeventer, Black, Meredith & Martin, Norfolk, Virginia; Cecelia Travers Roudiez, The Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
E.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Evone Foreman Gibson appeals from the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Chesapeake and Potomac Telephone Company and granting the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's Motion to Dismiss. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Gibson v. EEOC, No. CA-92-59 (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We deny Gibson's motion for court-appointed counsel
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
