Runnette Hicks, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Defendant-appellee, 998 F.2d 1009 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Runnette Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.
Luther Ellis Justis, Jr., BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, for Appellee.
D. Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Runnette Hicks appeals from the district court's order dismissing part of her Title VII action and granting Defendant's motion for summary judgment as to the remainder of her action. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hicks v. Baltimore Gas & Elec. Co., No. CA-90-3282 (D. Md. Dec. 7, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
