Romualdo Suarez, Appellant, v. Chuck Cole Wimes, Appellee, 996 F.2d 966 (8th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 996 F.2d 966 (8th Cir. 1993) Submitted: May 24, 1993. Decided July 1, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the W.D. Missouri; Dean Whipple, Judge.

Romualdo Suarez, pro se.

The appellee did not file a brief.

Before McMILLIAN, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


Romualdo Suarez appeals from the final order of the United States District Court1  for the Western District of Missouri dismissing for lack of jurisdiction Suarez's breach of contract claim filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Chuck Cole Wimes, a private citizen. Suarez has moved for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal.

In order to recover under § 1983, a plaintiff must prove that the defendant deprived him of a constitutional right under color of state law. Adickes v. S.H. Kress & Co., 398 U.S. 144, 150, 90 S. Ct. 1598, 1604, 26 L. Ed. 2d 142 (1970). Upon review of Suarez's complaint, we agree with the district court that Suarez has alleged only actions by a private citizen who was not acting under color of state law.

Thus, we deny Suarez leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss this appeal.

 1

The Honorable Dean Whipple, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.