Joseph Riddick, Plaintiff-appellant, v. White House, United States Government, Washington, D.c.,defendant-appellee, 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 996 F.2d 1212 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: June 7, 1993. Decided: June 24, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-179)

Joseph Riddick, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Joseph Riddick appeals from the district court's order dismissing Riddick's complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Riddick v. White House, No. CA-93-179 (W.D. Va. Mar. 5, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.