Maurice A. Davis, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Salem-teikyo University, a Corporation; It's Employees,agents and Those in Concert with It's Board Ofdirectors, Et. Al.; Edwin Allen, in Anindividual Capacity,defendants-appellees, 996 F.2d 1210 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. William M. Kidd, Senior District Judge. (CA-91-33-C-K)
Maurice A. Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Harry Patton Waddell, Steptoe & Johnson, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellees.
N.D.W. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Maurice A. Davis appeals from the district court's order denying him relief under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Davis v. Salem-Teikyo University, No. CA-91-33-C-K (N.D.W. Va. Nov. 10, 1992). We deny Davis's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
