North Alabama Express., an Alabama Corporation; Aaa Coopertransportation, Inc., an Alabama Corporation, Petitioners,alabama Public Service Commission; Milan Express, Inc., Intervenors, v. the Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States Ofamerica, Respondents,averitt Express, Inc.; Deaton, Inc., Intervenors, 996 F.2d 1072 (11th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseGeorge M. Boles, Weaver, Boles & Elmore, Birmingham, AL, for Neely & North Alabama Exp.
Robert C. Black, Montgomery, AL, for AAA Cooper.
Suellen Powers Lambert, Alabama Public Service Com'n, Montgomery, AL, for Alabama Public Service Com'n-internor.
Gerald D. Colvin, Jr., Bishop, Colvin, Johnson & Kent, Birmingham, AL, for Milan Exp., Inc.
Sidney L. Strickland, Secretary, I.C.C., Michael Martin, U.S. Atty. Gen., Robert B. Nicholson, Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC, for I.C.C. & U.S.A.
Robert L. Baker, Buck & Baker, Nashville, TN, for Averitt Exp., Inc.
Kim D. Mann, Shawn, Berger & Mann, Washington, DC, for Deaton, Inc.
Petition for Review of an Order of the Interstate Commerce Commission.
(ICC No. MC-F-19804.)
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
(Opinion Sept. 3, 1992, 11th Cir., 971 F.2d 661)
Before EDMONDSON, Circuit Judge, RONEY* and GIBSON** , Senior Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The following sentence is withdrawn from our opinion in this case:
For instance, the ICC could not approve the transfer of intrastate routes in Alabama if the only other aspects of the transaction involved interstate routes between Oregon and California.
North Alabama Exp., Inc. v. I.C.C., 971 F.2d 661, 665 (11th Cir. 1992). Otherwise, the petitions for rehearing filed by respondent Interstate Commerce Commission and intervening respondent Averitt Express, Inc. are denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
