Carrie Young-henderson, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Spartanburg Area Mental Health Center; Anita Stoddard,assistant Director; William S. Powell, M.d.,director; Anne S. Willis, Formerassistant Director,defendants-appellees, 993 F.2d 1542 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 993 F.2d 1542 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: March 16, 1993Decided: May 21, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. William M. Catoe, Jr., Magistrate Judge. (CA-89-41-7-3)

Carrie Young-Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

Leigh Mullikin Nason, Haynsworth, Baldwin, Johnson & Greaves, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Carrie Young-Henderson appeals from the district court's order denying her claims of employment discrimination in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.ss 2000e to 2000e17 (1988), 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1988), 42 U.S.C.s 1983 (1988), and the Fourteenth Amendment. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Young-Henderson v. Spartanburg Area Mental Health Ctr., No. CA-89-41-7-3 (D.S.C. June 19, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.