United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. James Daniel Clark, Defendant-appellant, 993 F.2d 1540 (4th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-91-738-R)
James Daniel Clark, Appellant Pro Se.
Ray Burton Fitzgerald, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
W.D. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and HALL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
James Daniel Clark appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Clark, No. CA-91-738-R (W.D. Va. Nov. 5, 1992). We deny Clark's motions to appoint counsel and for oral argument, and we dispense with argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We express no opinion about the merits of Clark's Fed. R. Crim. P. 32 motion, as the district court has not yet acted on it
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
