Kathryn Mumford, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Natalie Meyer, Secretary of State Natalie Meyers (sic);election Commission of the City and County of Denver, Namedas Election Commission; Arlys H. Ward, Executive Director;arie P. Taylor, President; Sharon Macdonald, Commissioner;sandy Adams, Commissioner, Defendants-appellees, 991 F.2d 805 (10th Cir. 1993)
Annotate this CaseBefore SEYMOUR, ANDERSON and EBEL, Circuit Judges.
ORDER AND JUDGMENT*
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Kathryn Mumford appeals the dismissal, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d), of her complaint against the Colorado Secretary of State, the Election Commission of the City and County of Denver, and other election officials. We review the district court's dismissal under the abuse of discretion standard. See Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S. Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992).
Upon a careful review of the file in this case we conclude that the district court did not err in dismissing Ms. Mumford's complaint.
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The mandate shall issue forthwith.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
