George H. Van Wagner, Iii, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Gregory Stambaugh; Peter Greenspun, Defendants-appellees, 991 F.2d 792 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 991 F.2d 792 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: February 1, 1993Decided: February 19, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-91-1554-AM)

George H. Van Wagner, III, Appellant Pro Se.

E.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

George H. Van Wagner, III, appeals from the district court's order dismissing his case without prejudice for failure to file a short and plain statement of the court's jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a) (1). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Van Wagner v. Stambaugh, No. CA91-1554-AM (E.D. Va. July 10, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.