Richard Terflinger, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Bernie Aispuro, et al., Defendant-appellee, 990 F.2d 1260 (9th Cir. 1993)Annotate this Case
Submitted March 23, 1993. *Decided April 6, 1993
Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and FARRIS and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
Terflinger, a pro se state prisoner, brought a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against several prison officials. The district court dismissed defendant P.A. Cruz because Terflingler failed to serve him in compliance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(j). Terflinger appeals. We affirm.
We review the district court's decision to dismiss Cruz for an abuse of discretion. Wei v. State of Hawaii, 763 F.2d 370, 371 (9th Cir. 1985) (per curiam). Rule 4(j) requires dismissal without prejudice of any defendant who is not served within 120 days after filing of the summons and complaint, unless the plaintiff can show "good cause".
Terflinger did not seek Cruz's address until more than ten months after service was returned unexecuted. Terflingler argues that he misunderstood the form that explained that Cruz had not been served. The district court did not abuse its discretion by finding that Terflinger had failed to establish "good cause".