Ernestine Petitt, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Martin Marietta Corporation, International Steel; Homeinsurance Co.; United States Federal Districtcourt, Defendants-appellees, 990 F.2d 1259 (9th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case

US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 990 F.2d 1259 (9th Cir. 1993) Submitted April 7, 1993. *Decided April 14, 1993

Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and RYMER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Ernestine Petitt appeals pro se the district court's order granting dismissal of her complaint with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b) (1) and (6) in favor of Martin Marietta Aluminum (Marietta), Home Insurance Company (Home Insurance) and the United States District Court (USDC) in her action under 5 U.S.C. § 552a, Title VII of the Civil Right Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, and 1985. Petitt alleged that (1) she was denied proper medical treatment while working for Marietta, (2) Home Insurance did not promptly pay her medical bills, and (3) the USDC joined in a conspiracy against her by dismissing her two previous complaints. We review de novo, Andrade v. United States Sentencing Comm'n, No. 91-16249, slip op. 2681, 2683 (9th Cir. Mar. 24, 1993), and we affirm for the reasons stated in the district court's order granting the defendants' motion to dismiss.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.