Margie L. Blythe, Petitioner, v. Office of Personnel Management, Respondent, 988 F.2d 128 (Fed. Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit - 988 F.2d 128 (Fed. Cir. 1992) Dec. 7, 1992

54 M.S.P.R. 424.

DISMISSED.

ON MOTION

SCHALL, Circuit Judge.


ORDER

Margie L. Blythe moves for a further extension of time to file her informal brief.

In September, Blythe moved for a 30-day extension of time to file her informal brief. The motion was granted in part. Blythe was also instructed to promptly file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement regarding discrimination. Blythe did not file a brief or a R. 15(c) statement. Instead, Blythe moved for an additional 30-day extension of time. On October 29, 1992, the court granted the second motion in part: "the informal brief is due November 17, 1992. No further extensions." The court also warned Blythe that her case would be dismissed if she did not file a R. 15(c) statement. Again, Blythe did neither and again she asked for a third extension.

Blythe's motion for an extension is not granted. When the court says "no further extensions," it means exactly what it says. Moreover, the R. 15(c) statement has not been filed.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

Blythe's motion for an extension is denied. The Clerk is directed to dismiss Blythe's case for failure to prosecute.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.