Notice: Eighth Circuit Rule 28a(k) Governs Citation of Unpublished Opinions and Provides That They Are Not Precedent and Generally Should Not Be Cited Unless Relevant to Establishing the Doctrines of Res Judicata, Collateral Estoppel, the Law of the Case, or if the Opinion Has Persuasive Value on a Material Issue and No Published Opinion Would Serve As Well.robert L. Endres, Plaintiff Appellant, v. Paul K. Delo, Superintendent, Defendant Appellee, 986 F.2d 502 (8th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - 986 F.2d 502 (8th Cir. 1993) Submitted: September 17, 1992. Filed: January 5, 1993

Before McMILLIAN, WOLLMAN, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.


The judgment of the district court is reversed and the case is remanded to the district court for reconsideration of plaintiff's claim that he was placed in double jeopardy at the robbery trial (the claim labeled Ground II in the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation of July 8, 1991) in light of this court's opinion in McIntyre v. Trickey, 975 F.2d 437 (1992). In all other respects, the decision of the district court is affirmed.

On appeal, the parties have debated whether the robbery trial double jeopardy claim is governed by Harris v. Oklahoma, 433 U.S. 76 (1977), an issue we leave to the district court on remand.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.