James Milton De Vone, Sr., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Fannie Batchelor, Defendant-appellee, 986 F.2d 1413 (4th Cir. 1993)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 986 F.2d 1413 (4th Cir. 1993) Submitted: February 1, 1993Decided: February 16, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge; Russell A. Eliason, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-212)

James Milton De Vone, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Michael Bannon Brough, Alison Ailene Erca, Michael B. Brough & Associates, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, for Appellee.

M.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:


James Milton De Vone, Sr., appeals from the district court's order affirming the magistrate judge's denial of his motions for default judgment. We dismiss for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not an appealable order. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory.*  We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

 *

We deny Batchelor's motion for sanctions

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.