United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Juan Armando Ordaz-mendez, Defendant-appellant, 983 F.2d 1079 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 983 F.2d 1079 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted Dec. 21, 1992. *Decided Dec. 30, 1992

Before TANG, NOONAN and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM^**

Juan Armando Ordaz-Mendez appeals his conviction, following a guilty plea, for being a deported alien found in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ordaz-Mendez's counsel filed a brief stating that she finds no issues for review and a motion to withdraw. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no issues for review.

Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment and grant counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record.

AFFIRMED.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.