United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Anthony Grandison, Defendant-appellant, 981 F.2d 1252 (4th Cir. 1992)

 Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 981 F.2d 1252 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: November 30, 1992Decided: December 21, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CR-83-200-HM)

Anthony Grandison, Appellant Pro Se.

Juliet Ann Eurich, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

D. Md.

Affirmed.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER,*  Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

OPINION

Anthony Grandison appeals from the district court's order denying Grandison's motion to correct his sentence.*  Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Grandison, No. CR-83-200-HM (D. Md. July 31, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 *

Judge Niemeyer did not participate in consideration of this case. The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d)

 *

We have treated the motion as one under 28 U.S.C.s 2255 (1988). See United States v. Santora, 711 F.2d 41, 42 (5th Cir. 1983)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.