United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. David Joe Martin, Defendant-appellant, 980 F.2d 741 (10th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAfter examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying him release pending sentencing. The district court docket sheet reflects that the district court sentenced appellant on October 28, and on November 5, appellant filed an appeal from his conviction and sentence, as well as the order detaining him pending appeal. Therefore, this appeal from the denial of release pending sentencing is MOOT and is hereby DISMISSED.
This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.