United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Worrell Robotham, Defendant-appellant, 980 F.2d 728 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 980 F.2d 728 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: October 26, 1992Decided: November 30, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CR-89-85, CA-91-455-R)

Worrell Robotham, Appellant Pro Se.

Jean Martel Barrett, Office of the United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.

W.D. Va.

Affirmed.

Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


OPINION

Worrell Robotham appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Robotham, Nos. CR-89-85, CA-91-455-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 18, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED