Barry Lane Carey, Plaintiff-appellant, v. W. D. Blankenship; D. L. Smith; P. L. Huffman; K. A.polinsky; S. Meeks; v. Wolfe; T. R. Williams; Medicaldepartment; L. L. Saul; L. C. Hughes; L. C. King; J. W.mustard; R. G. Lilly; C. Simmerman; R. A. Young;virginia Parole Board, Defendants-appellees, 980 F.2d 727 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 980 F.2d 727 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: September 25, 1992Decided: December 11, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-205-R)

Barry Lane Carey, Appellant Pro Se.

Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D. Va.

AFFIRMED.

OPINION

Before PHILLIPS, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Barry Lane Carey appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Carey v. Blankenship, No. CA-92-205-R (W.D. Va. June 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED