Frank Casali, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Stephen A. Truman, Roseville Director of Building Inspectionthomas B. Van Damme, Roseville City Manager;rebecca Richards, Roseville Codeenforcement Officer,defendants-appellees, 977 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 977 F.2d 580 (6th Cir. 1992) Oct. 13, 1992

Before MILBURN, ALAN E. NORRIS, and KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM.


Frank Casali, the Plaintiff-Appellant, has appealed the decision of the District Court granting summary judgment in favor of Stephen A. Truman, Thomas B. Van Damme and Rebecca Richards, Defendant-Appellees, in this action brought seeking damages and injunctive relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 42 U.S.C. § 1985, and declaratory relief that the Roseville Sign Ordinance violates plaintiff-appellant's right to free speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

A review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel discloses that appellant's assignments of error are without merit.

Accordingly, the grant of summary judgment in favor of Stephen A. Truman, Thomas B. Van Damme and Rebecca Richards is AFFIRMED for the reasons stated by the district court in its order of September 25, 1991.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.