In Re: Snowshoe Company, Debtor.snowshoe Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Shenandoah Federal Savings & Loan Association; John N.taylor; David W. Ralston, Defendants-appellees, 977 F.2d 574 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins.
Argued: Spicer Franklin Burford, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellant. M. Blane Michael, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.
On Brief: Ellen S. Cappellanti, Jackson & Kelly, Charleston, West Virginia; Lawrence A. Katz, Gary D. Weinfield, Zuckerman, Spaeder, Goldstein, Taylor & Kolker, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
N.D.W. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and DOUMAR, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
The district court adopted the bankruptcy court's proposed findings and conclusions after ruling that the Snowshoe Company's specific objections were without substance and entered summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Our consideration of the record, the oral argument and the district court's opinion in this case has revealed that this appeal by the Snowshoe Company is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm this order on the reasoning of the district court. In re Snowshoe Company, debtor: Snowshoe Co. v. Shenandoah Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n, No. CA-88-43-E (N.D.W. Va. April 17, 1991).
AFFIRMED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
