United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Eddie Gamble, Defendant-appellant, 977 F.2d 574 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Richard C. Erwin, Chief District Judge. (CR-88-43-D, CR-88-31-D, CA-90-436, CA-91-319)
Eddie Gamble, Appellant Pro Se.
John Warren Stone, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
M.D.N.C.
Affirmed.
Before PHILLIPS, SPROUSE, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
Eddie Gamble appeals from the district court's order denying his motion, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), for reconsideration of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's order discloses no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, we affirm.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We note that Gamble's second motion under 28 U.S.C.s 2255 (1988) was transmitted to this Court with the record of this case, and had not been acted on by the district court at the time of transmission. Our decision today does not affect Gamble's second motion
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
