Paul Stanley James, Plaintiff-appellant, v. the Mayor of the City of Durham; City of Durham, Northcarolina; Durham Police Department; E. F. Mitchell, P.o.ii; J. L. Robinson, Sergeant; K. A. Hall, Officer; J. E.shelby; K. A. May, Cpl.; Durham County Jail; Durham Citycouncil; Martha Jean James; Robert Seth Warner; Arthurprussia; James Hardin; Thomas H. Eagen; Daniel Read,defendants-appellees, 977 F.2d 572 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 977 F.2d 572 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: September 28, 1992Decided: October 22, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Huntington.

Paul Stanley James, Appellant Pro Se.

S.D.W. Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Paul James appeals from the district court's order dismissing his complaint as a result of improper venue. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. James v. Mayor of Durham, No. CA-92-725-3 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 25, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.