In Re: S. Franklin Burford, Debtor.s. Franklin Burford, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Michael L. Bray, Defendant-appellee.in Re: S. Franklin Burford, Debtor.s. Franklin Burford, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Michael L. Bray, Defendant-appellee, 977 F.2d 571 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-88-102-E, BK-88-364-C-T)
S. Franklin Burford, Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellant.
Michael L. Bray, STEPTOE & JOHNSON, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
N.D.W. Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and HALL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
These consolidated appeals involve two orders of the district court. We granted the appellee's motion to have both cases submitted for decision on the briefs, without oral argument. Our consideration of the record, and the district court's opinions in these cases has revealed that these appeals are without merit. Accordingly, we affirm each of these orders on the reasoning of the district court. In re Burford, debtor: Burford v. Bray, No. CA-88-102-E (N.D.W. Va. November 22, 1990).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
