Gerals Bryant, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Captain Sumner; Sergeant Rose; Sergeant Truman; Officercherry, Individually and in Their Official Capacities Ascorrectional Officers in the North Carolina Department Ofcorrections, Defendants-appellees, 977 F.2d 571 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseAppeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Gerald Bryant, Appellant Pro Se.
Jane Ray Garvey, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gerald Bryant appeals from the magistrate judge's* order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the magistrate judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Bryant v. Sumner, No. CA-90-357-CRT-DE (E.D.N.C. Feb. 7, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1988)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
