United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Alba Ester Cardona, Defendant-appellant, 972 F.2d 349 (6th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 972 F.2d 349 (6th Cir. 1992) Aug. 18, 1992

Before KEITH and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges, and WELLFORD, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

Alba Ester Cardona appeals a district court order denying her petition for writ of mandamus. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

In 1991, Cardona pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute cocaine and was sentenced to 120 months incarceration. Following her conviction, Cardona filed a petition for writ of mandamus. In her petition, Cardona sought to compel the United States Immigration and Naturalization Services (INS), pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(i), to institute immediate deportation proceedings against Cardona, who is a deportable alien. The district court determined that the petition was meritless and dismissed the case. Cardona has filed a timely appeal. On appeal, she requests permission to proceed in forma pauperis and appointment of counsel.

Upon review, we affirm the district court's denial of Cardona's petition for writ of mandamus. Cardona is not entitled to the writ upon the facts of this case. See Aguirre v. Meese, 930 F.2d 1292, 1293 (7th Cir. 1991); Gonzalez v. INS, 867 F.2d 1108, 1109-10 (8th Cir. 1989).

Accordingly, we grant Cardona in forma pauperis status, deny her request for appointment of counsel, and affirm the district court's judgment. Rule 9(b) (3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.