George W. Gantt, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Richard A. Lanham, Commissioner of Correction; Carlawithers, Coordinator; Marvin Robbins, I.g.c., Intheir Personal and Individualcapacities, Defendants-appellees, 966 F.2d 1442 (4th Cir. 1992)
Annotate this CaseGeorge W. Gantt, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Before PHILLIPS, WILKINSON, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
OPINION
George W. Gantt appeals from the district court's order granting Gantt's motion to voluntarily dismiss this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). A plaintiff may not appeal an order granting a motion to voluntarily dismiss a case without conditions. Unioil, Inc. v. E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., 809 F.2d 548, 555 (9th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We deny Gantt's "Motion to Strike" cases, his "Motion Requesting Stay of Proceedings," and his motion for an order to show cause. We deny his motion to deconsolidate cases as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
