United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Clarence Bernardo Patterson, Defendant-appellant, 963 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - 963 F.2d 381 (9th Cir. 1992) Submitted May 13, 1992. *Decided May 18, 1992

Before BOOCHEVER, REINHARDT and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM** 

Federal district courts have broad authority to revoke probation, and we will reverse such a decision only for an abuse of discretion. United States v. Laughlin, 933 F.2d 786, 788 (9th Cir. 1991). There was none here.

AFFIRMED.

 *

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

 **

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3