Jerry Lee Word, Petitioner-appellant, v. United States of America, Respondent-appellee, 963 F.2d 374 (6th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - 963 F.2d 374 (6th Cir. 1992) May 19, 1992

Before NATHANIEL R. JONES and RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judges, and KRUPANSKY, Senior Circuit Judge.


ORDER

Jerry Lee Word appeals the district court's order dismissing his motion to vacate sentence. 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Word was convicted of forty-five counts of violating drug laws by selling prescriptions of controlled substances. He received a twenty-five year sentence. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 9(a), Rules of the Sixth Circuit. Upon examination of the record and briefs, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a).

In his motion to vacate, Word claimed that the government improperly suppressed evidence concerning whether John Moore acted as an informant and testified before a grand jury in 1984. He further alleged that he received ineffective assistance of counsel in preparing his first motion to vacate sentence. The district court denied relief as these grounds had already been addressed in Word's previous motions. See Sanders v. United States, 373 U.S. 1, 15 (1963); Lonberger v. Marshall, 808 F.2d 1169, 1173 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1055 (1987).

Word presents the same arguments on appeal.

Upon consideration, for the reasons stated in the district court's December 13, 1991, order, we affirm the dismissal of the motion. Rule 9(b) (3), Rules of the Sixth Circuit.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.