Bernard Thomas Church, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Halifax County Jail; Joe Edmonson; W. K. Bond,defendants-appellees, 960 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. 1992)

Annotate this Case
US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - 960 F.2d 145 (4th Cir. 1992) Submitted: April 6, 1992April 17, 1992

Bernard Thomas Church, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Kay Dillon, WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:


Bernard Church noted this appeal outside of the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (1) and beyond the excusable neglect period established by Fed. R. App. P. 4(a) (5). The time periods established by Fed. R. App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). The district court granted a motion for extension of time to appeal; however, because the notice of appeal was filed beyond the excusable neglect period, the district court did not have jurisdiction to grant an extension. Hensley v. Chesapeake & O. Ry., 651 F.2d 226, 228 (4th Cir. 1981). The Appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We agree that Church's failure to note an appeal within the limits set by Fed. R. App. P. 4 deprives this Court of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.